
Where
are we with our building project?
Bill
Bradley gave the following progress report to the congregation after
the 8.00 and 10.15 services on Sunday 7 December:
The
last update on our project, which, as you know, aims to undertake
internal improvements to the building, was in June when it was
announced that the application to the Heritage Lottery Fund had been
unsuccessful and the PCC had subsequently agreed a 3-stage strategy
to move the project forward.
As you will remember, the first stage was to determine whether we
should re-apply for the Heritage Grant. We met with Officers from
HLF and it was clear that there would be little capital funding
available in the next few years although we could apply for revenue
grants. As our priority was for primarily capital building works PCC
decided not to re-apply at that time.
The
second stage or option was to explore a revised less costly scheme
with the emphasis on Community and church needs. We are now at this
stage and if the funding for this option cannot be found then PCC
has agreed to undertake whatever works it can with the monies
available.
It
is clear that your PCC is determined to improve the facilities
within the building and I would like to take this opportunity to say
a big thank you on behalf of the PCC for all the support it has
received from the congregation - support that has shown itself in so
many ways.
So
where are we with the project?
The
revised scheme has been prepared at an estimated capital cost of £700
– £750,000 and the latest plans are displayed on the boards in
the south aisle. The main difference from the original plans is the
loss of the second floor levels at both the east and west ends of
the building together with the change of emphasis from heritage to
community learning.
In
addition to the capital costs of the project there will also be
initial revenue costs to find to meet the running costs some of
which will be met from grants and some from increased income. It is
intended that the project should be sustainable within 3 years.
A
Funding Profile is in place, which is based on a funding package
involving 3 major funding bodies – the development agency
Yorkshire Forward, the Coalfields Regeneration Trust and ourselves.
Previously we were looking at 2 major funding bodies – HLF and
ourselves.
In
round figures we are looking to raise
£250,000
from Yorkshire Forward (YF)
£300,000
from Coalfields Regeneration Trust (CRT)
and
the balance from ourselves and various smaller grant-making trusts.
Members
of the Building Group have held several meetings with both CRT and
with WMDC as it is the Council who will receive the overall YF
allocation and will be responsible for distributing it to individual
projects.
We
originally planned to apply for £150,000 from CRT but during our
discussions with them we have been advised to go for the maximum
funding of £300,000, which is very encouraging. Our project fits in
very well with the CRT criteria as a number of our aims relate to
improving the quality of life of those people in our community who
live in some of the most deprived former coalfield areas in the
country. We were initially encouraged by CRT to start our project on
1st April next year but this has not proved to be
possible as we couldn’t guarantee the match funding from YF (which
only becomes available in the new financial year) nor from
ourselves.
In
seeking the match funding from YF we have corresponded and/or held
meetings with Elected members and officers of Wakefield Council
including the Deputy Leader, all 6 Pontefract Councillors, the
Director of Regeneration Services and several members of his staff
involved with Major Projects. We understand that over the next few
years the YF allocation made to Wakefield Council will be spent in
areas other than Wakefield City and Castleford, which have received
vast amounts of regeneration monies in recent years. The church was
well represented in the consultation process in the preparation of
the Pontefract Masterplan and following its completion in 2007 this
area will now be a priority for regeneration. St Giles church
features very prominently within the proposals for the town and it
is on this basis together with the economic inclusion aspects of our
project relating to the work of the Job club in particular, that we
are pursuing YF funding for the improvement of the facilities within
the building.
Any
other match funding must come from ourselves and other smaller
grant-making bodies. For a scheme costing in excess of three
quarters of a million pounds it is not easy to secure funds from
small trusts and this is why we are continuing to concentrate on
getting the support of major funders like CRT and YF in the first
instance. If we can secure funding from these it should be a
reasonably straightforward task to get smaller funders on board.
Nevertheless, we have already received £5000 from the Bishops
Development Fund, £2000 from Wakefield’s Community Chest and £1000
from Allchurches Trust, which is the
ultimate parent company of Ecclesiastical Insurance Office plc from
which it receives its income. In addition a donation of £10,000 has
been promised by U K Coal plc on receipt of a planning decision
notice for the development of the former Prince of Wales colliery
site. We have been told to expect the cheque early in the New Year.
With
regard to the church’s contribution to the project we must clearly
demonstrate our own commitment to the scheme to those bodies from
whom we are seeking financial support. Although we have not put a
definitive figure on what our contribution should be, other funders
might expect our own organisation to contribute somewhere between 25
– 30% of total costs. This might mean a contribution of between £187,500
and £225,000 for capital build costs. The PCC is looking at a
number of means to achieve this.
Our
own funding strategy includes: -
Direct
Giving
– which must be the major part of our own funding of the project,
either lump sums or through Standing Orders. We are very grateful to
those who are helping in this way. For those who have not yet
contributed in this way or have not yet had the opportunity to do
so, I would urge you to speak to Linda Atkins, Chairman of the
Fundraising Group or Fr Ian, Treasurer of the Community Fund.
Fundraising
Activities –
these activities are essential as they also raise awareness of our
project within the community. The Fundraising Group have been
working hard on this aspect of the project as have a number of
individuals – Kath and Ann’s Whist Drives are now a regular
feature within the church’s calendar, Barbara’s Vicars Tarts,
Angela’s anthology of poems, Jean’s cards and Eileens dreaded
quiz’s just to mention a few – apologies to anyone who I
haven’t mentioned – I realise it is always dangerous to mention
names! Again we are very grateful for the continuing support given
to these fundraising activities by the congregation. I understand
that it is hoped to organise a number of events next year that will
attract more people from the local community so look out for those.
Legacies
and donations from businesses and other organisations –
are other means of meeting our funding target.
I’ve
mentioned the work being done by the Building Group and the
Fundraising Group and I would like to also mention the work
undertaken by the Worship Group which is a constant source of
strength to us all. Thank you for your support to this group and for
your continuing prayers for the project. Again there are some
exciting things being planned by this group for the New Year so look
out for those also.
I’m
conscious that my report has been very finance orientated but we
have now reached a stage where the project cannot proceed very much
further without the funding package now coming together. Although
nothing can be guaranteed, I feel we have a rare opportunity to get
this project off the ground during 2009 utilising the resources of 2
major funding organisations both of which regard Pontefract as a
priory area. After 10 years of trying perhaps the time is now right
for this project to come to fruition.
St
Giles Church has, throughout its history, overcome the need to
change and adapt to meet the needs of its congregation and local
community. Without being pretentious in any way, it is 140 years
since the last major alterations took place and it may well have
fallen on us at this time to undertake the next major improvements
to the building to bring the facilities up to modern day standards
and to meet, as much as possible, the expectations and needs of our
local community.
Bill
Bradley Chairman, Building Group